nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 01, v.14 88-98
我们都是“叛逃者”:博士生去学术社会化及其内在机制研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“人工智能赋能视角下‘拔尖计划’本科生的深度学习研究:内涵再构、影响机制与提升策略”(BIA240122);国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“数智技术赋能视角下高水平综合大学教育硕士跨界培养机制构建研究”(BIA250145)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.01.009
摘要:

去学术社会化被视为博士生学术社会化的暗面,是博士生多元化就业的必由之路,但在长期的博士生教育研究和实践中遭到了忽视。在博士生培养规模扩大的背景下,这不利于系统理解和引导博士生的非学术部门就业。去学术社会化是博士生在读博期间基于对学术价值和自我未来学术发展的整体认知,产生和潜隐放弃学术共同体的规范、价值观和行为模式,寻找和实现非学术职业的内在倾向和真实态度。去学术社会化同时发生制度性或表演性的学术社会化。以中学博士教师为例,通过质性研究发现,由非学术职业的预先认知、另类动机和职业胜任判断构成的内在认知,导师支持、同辈示范组成的重要他人引导,以及关注自我生活、注重家庭责任形成的自我生活追求等,是博士生去学术社会化的直接成因;同一性断裂和预期性式微引起的科研祛魅,表现为预期科研目标与实际科研价值存在错位、理想岗位与就业挑战存在悖反,是博士生去学术社会化的根本肇因。这些因素使博士生更加注重从自我需求角度考虑职业选择,并进一步在非学术职业尝试中找到适合自我实现的发展性空间和给予快速价值回应的填补性反馈,最终明确非学术职业发展方向。为促进博士生有序去学术社会化,全力保障人尽其才,应加强职业生涯指导,引导博士生反思去学术社会化;优化科研支持环境,引导博士生审慎去学术社会化;培养通用实践能力,保障博士生平稳去学术社会化。

Abstract:

As the dark side of “academic socialization” of doctoral students, “de-academic socialization” is the only way for doctoral students to diversify their employment, which has been ignored in long-term doctoral education, research and practice. In the context of the expansion of doctoral training, this is not conducive to systematically understanding and guiding doctoral students' employment in non-academic departments. “De-academic socialization” refers to the internal tendency and true attitude of doctoral students based on their overall understanding of academic values and their future academic development during their PhD studies, to implicitly abandon the norms, values and behavior patterns of the academic community during their doctoral studies, and to find and realize non-academic careers. De-academic socialization occurs simultaneously with institutional or performative academic socialization. Taking secondary school doctoral teachers as an example, qualitative research has found that the internal cognition formed by pre-existing perceptions of non-academic careers, alternative motivations, and judgments of professional competence, the guidance of significant others consisting of mentor support and peer modeling, as well as the pursuit of personal life shaped by self-life focus and family responsibilities are the direct causes of doctoral students' de-academic socialization. The disenchantment with scientific research, caused by identity rupture and diminishing anticipations, manifests as a misalignment between expected research goals and actual research value, as well as a paradox between ideal positions and employment challenges, which constitutes the fundamental cause of their de-academic socialization. These factors lead doctoral students to place greater emphasis on considering career choices from the perspective of their own needs. They further seek developmental spaces suitable for self-realization and rapid value-responsive feedback through explorations in non-academic careers, ultimately clarifying their direction in non-academic professional paths. To facilitate the orderly de-academic socialization of doctoral students and fully ensure the maximization of individual potential, it is essential to enhance career guidance, encouraging doctoral students to reflect on de-academic socialization; optimize the research support environment, guiding doctoral students to approach de-academic socialization prudently; and cultivate general practical skills, ensuring a smooth transition in their de-academic socialization.

参考文献

[1] 沈文钦,谢心怡,郭二榕.学术劳动力市场变革及其对博士生教育的影响[J].教育研究,2022,43(5):70-82.

[2] 樊秀娣,沈晶晶.从单一到多元:博士生职业发展多样化的现实需求及教育支持策略研究[J].高校教育管理,2024,18(1):81-91,112.

[3] 徐贞,牛梦虎.就业多元化趋势下博士生教育改革研究[J].教育发展研究,2017,37(9):64-71.

[4] NEUMANN R,TAN K K.From PhD to initial employment:the doctorate in a knowledge economy[J].Studies in higher education,2011,36(5):601-614.

[5] 王思遥,黄亚婷.缘何走出象牙塔:三元交互理论视角下博士毕业生的非学术职业选择[J].学位与研究生教育,2024(5):42-52.

[6] 陈纯槿.海外留学如何影响博士毕业生的学术职业选择:来自全球博士生项目中国调查的证据[J].上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,32(5):79-91.

[7] 刘少杰.国外社会学理论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006:1.

[8] WEIDMAN J C,STEIN E L.Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms[J].Research in higher education,2003,44(6):641-656.

[9] 郭月兰.我国博士生社会化研究综述[J].现代教育科学,2018(9):140-145.

[10] 张晓洁,杨程越.何以为学:博士生学术职业社会化影响因素与路径探究[J].研究生教育研究,2024(1):39-47,73.

[11] 张茜.理想与现实之间:博士生学术职业社会化的张力及其消解[J].大学教育科学,2022(3):94-101,109.

[12] 陈小满,樊小冬.为未来高校教师准备:博士生学术社会化过程探究[J].中国青年研究,2021(2):97-104.

[13] GRIVA F,TSEFERIDI S I,ANAGNOSTOPOULOS F.Time to get healthy:associations of time perspective with perceived health status and health behaviors[J].Psychology health & medicine,2015,20(1):25-33.

[14] 徐贞.理工科博士生入学动机及其对学术表现、就业偏好的影响:基于全国35所研究生院高校的调查[J].中国高教研究,2018(9):74-80.

[15] 李伟健,家晓余,陈海德,等.自定步调学习时间的习惯性反应:来自眼动的证据[J].心理科学,2013,36(5):1043-1047.

[16] 韩双淼,傅浩东.如何应对多元职业趋势:角色理论视域下博士生核心能力研究[J].现代大学教育,2024,40(6):84-91,113.

[17] 吴宗友,丁京.在下沉中突围:“引才大战”中青年博士反向择业的空间意涵——以W市“紫云英”引才活动为例[J].中国青年研究,2024(3):95-103,111.

[18] 苗学杰,李盼盼.“入乡”与“离乡”:认同视角下乡村青年教师缘何流动[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2024,26(5):125-132.

[19] 马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,2000:52.

[20] 雷冰洁.加速社会中青年意义世界的构建[J].思想理论教育,2022(12):96-101.

[21] 姜国钧,宿文琳.基于创造峰值年龄的高校科研人才管理策略漫议[J].现代大学教育,2020,36(6):39-45,112.

[22] 李荣华,鲁长风,田友谊.博士生学术韧性的影响因素研究:基于一项混合方法研究的探索[J].学位与研究生教育,2024(9):50-58.

[23] 杨婧,王欣,杨河清.“内卷化”视角下科研人员过度劳动问题研究:以高校教师为例[J].中国人力资源开发,2024,41(4):109-124.

[24] RUDOLPH J,TAN S,TAN S.ChatGPT:bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?[J].Journal of applied learning and teaching,2023,6(1):342-363.

[25] 黄维海,李树岳.“理想奔现”与“现实优化”:博士生就业多元化源流分析[J].中国高教研究,2024(12):70-76.

[26] 李莞荷,乔路通.不同招生方式的博士生培养质量[J].高教发展与评估,2025,41(3):105-115,133-134.

[27] 陈新忠,陈柯铮.博士毕业生选择回归学术职业的机理与困境:基于社会建构视角的分析[J].高等教育研究,2024,45(4):35-45.

[28] 维克多·弗兰克尔.活出生命的意义[M].吕娜,译.北京:华夏出版社,2010:6.

[29] 左晶晶,段鑫星.博士生教育质量评价的负向指征及其修正——基于2019年《Nature》博士生调查的学生参与分析[J].高教探索,2024(1):44-53.

[30] 徐岚,魏庆义.非学术部门就业对博士生的质量需求:胜任力分类理论视角下基于招聘信息内容的分析[J].高校教育管理,2023,17(4):87-101.

[31] 刘璐璐.北欧国家博士生教育改革的动因、举措与逻辑:基于瑞典、挪威、芬兰、丹麦四国的考察[J].外国教育研究,2024,51(8):51-69.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.01.009

中图分类号:G643

引用信息:

[1]吴荩萱,李锐.我们都是“叛逃者”:博士生去学术社会化及其内在机制研究[J].重庆高教研究,2026,14(01):88-98.DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.01.009.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“人工智能赋能视角下‘拔尖计划’本科生的深度学习研究:内涵再构、影响机制与提升策略”(BIA240122);国家社会科学基金教育学一般项目“数智技术赋能视角下高水平综合大学教育硕士跨界培养机制构建研究”(BIA250145)

发布时间:

2025-09-17

出版时间:

2025-09-17

网络发布时间:

2025-09-17

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文