| 825 | 1 | 44 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
“象牙塔尖的生存困境”是博士生教育发展亟待回应的现实问题。基于Nature全球研究生调查中的博士生数据,对博士生工作时间投入与焦虑问题进行深度剖析。研究发现,全球博士生每周工作时间普遍超过40小时,虽多数未过劳,但超过一半存在焦虑问题;中国和印度博士生过劳及焦虑的占比较高,中国大部分博士生处于极度疲劳状态,焦虑问题未得到有效解决。从类型学视角考察,共存在“过劳又郁”型、“劳而不郁”型、“非劳但郁”型、“非劳非郁”型4种类型的博士生;全球博士生以“劳而不郁”型为主;德国、英国和法国博士生以“非劳非郁”型为主,美国博士生以“劳而不郁”型为主,中国和印度博士生以“过劳又郁”型为主;中国博士生极端分化现象明显,“过劳又郁”型占比在各国中最高,而“非劳非郁”型占比在各国中最低。工作时间投入不会直接导致焦虑;工作生活平衡感知、关系支持、情感支持可以预防焦虑;对非过劳博士生而言,学术志趣可以防止焦虑,但职业支持会造成焦虑;对过劳博士生而言,能力水平会造成焦虑。基于焦虑图谱分析,博士生焦虑并非个体抗压能力不足所致,更多的是学术劳动力市场结构性失衡、学术职业保障缺失和社会经济压力共同作用的结果。应优化博士生培养机制,减轻制度性压力;建设心理健康支持体系,强化导师责任担当;优化学位点布局与结构,拓宽博士生职业出路。
Abstract:“The survival dilemma of the ivory spire” is a realistic issue that urgently needs to be responded to in the development of doctoral education. Based on the data of doctoral students in the Nature's global graduate student survey, an in-depth analysis was conducted on the problems of doctoral students' working time investment and anxiety. The study shows that doctoral students worldwide generally work more than 40 hours per week. Although most of them are not overworked, more than half of them have anxiety problems. The proportion of overwork and anxiety among doctoral students in China and India is relatively high. Most doctoral students in China are in an extremely fatigued state, and the problem of anxiety has not received effective assistance. From the perspective of typology, there are four types of doctoral students: “overworked and depressed” type, “overworked but not depressed” type, “not overworked but depressed” type, and “neither overworked nor depressed” type. The majority of doctoral students worldwide are of the “overworked but not depressed” type. Doctoral students in Germany, the United Kingdom and France are mainly of the “neither overworked nor depressed” type, those in the United States are mainly of the “overworked but not depressed” type, and those in China and India are mainly of the “overworked and depressed” type. The phenomenon of extreme differentiation among Chinese doctoral students is obvious. The proportion of the “overworked and depressed” type is the highest among all countries, while the proportion of the “neither overworked nor depressed” type is the lowest among all countries. Working time investment does not directly lead to anxiety. Perception of work-life balance, relationship support and emotional support can prevent anxiety. For non-overworked doctoral students, academic interests can prevent anxiety, but career support can lead to anxiety. For overworked doctoral students, ability levels can lead to anxiety. Based on the anxiety spectrum analysis, the anxiety of doctoral students is not caused by insufficient individual stress resistance ability. Instead, it is more the result of the combined effect of structural imbalance in the academic labor market, the lack of academic career security, and social and economic pressure. The cultivation mechanism for doctoral students should be optimized to alleviate institutional pressures. A mental health support system should be established, with supervisors taking greater responsibility. The layout and structure of degree programs should be improved to broaden career prospects for doctoral students.
[1] 程猛,李嘉怡.象牙塔尖的忧郁:博士生抑郁体验的叙事研究[J].教育研究,2022,43(7):88-103.
[2] 程猛,吴慧敏,马啸.读博:一场精神赌博?——国外关于博士生抑郁风险的研究述评[J].比较教育研究,2020,42(8):26-33.
[3] 邵剑耀,苏悦.博士生求职的类型及影响因素:基于Nature全球研究生调查的实证分析[J].高等理科教育,2025(3):113-123.
[4] 陈洪捷,赵世奎,沈文钦,等.中国博士培养质量:成就、问题与对策[J].学位与研究生教育,2011(6):40-45.
[5] 张莹,姚昊,马立超.社会支持视域下全球博士生焦虑心理的影响因素研究[J].北京教育(高教),2023(3):50-54.
[6] FOLKMAN S.Dynamics of a stressful encounter:cognitive appraisal,coping,and encounter outcomes[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,1986,50(5):992-1003.
[7] FOLKMAN S.Stress:appraisal and coping[M]//GELLMAN M D,TURNER J R.Encyclopedia of behavioral medicine.New York:Springer Science+Business Media,2013:1913-1915.
[8] 桑森垚,黄玲君.目的地原住民如何应对外来旅游从业者的群际威胁:基于压力应对理论的思考[J].旅游学刊,2024,39(10):83-96.
[9] LIPPKE S.Self-efficacy theory[M]//ZEIGLER-HILL V,SHACKELFORD T K.Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences.New York:Springer International Publishing AG,2017:1-6.
[10] CULLEN F T,WRIGHT J P,CHAMLIN M B.Social support and social reform:a progressive crime control agenda[J].Crime & delinquency,1999,45(2):188-207.
[11] COHEN S,WILLS T A.Stress,social support,and the buffering hypothesis[J].Psychological bulletin,1985,98(2):310-357.
[12] SVERDLIK A,HALL N C,MCALPINE L,et al.Journeys of a PhD student and unaccompanied minors[J].International journal of doctoral studies,2018,13:361-388.
[13] MACKIE S A,BATES G W.Contribution of the doctoral education environment to PhD candidates’ mental health problems:a scoping review[J].Higher education research & development,2018,38(3):565-578.
[14] 徐贞.理工科博士生入学动机及其对学术表现、就业偏好的影响:基于全国35所研究生院高校的调查[J].中国高教研究,2018(9):74-80.
[15] 陈东琳,谢鑫.博士生心理健康危机的影响因素研究[J].扬州大学学报(高教研究版),2024,28(5):88-99.
[16] VAN ROOIJ E,FOKKENS-BRUINSMA M,JANSEN E.Factors that influence PhD candidates’ success:the importance of PhD project characteristics[J].Studies in continuing education,2019,43(1):48-67.
[17] TOMMASI F,TOSCANO F,GIUSINO D,et al.Meaningful or meaningless?organizational conditions influencing doctoral students’ mental health and achievement[J].International journal of doctoral studies,2022,17:301-321.
[18] BAKKER A B,DEMEROUTI E.Job demands-resources theory:taking stock and looking forward[J].Journal of occupational health psychology,2017:22(3):273-285.
[19] KOLMOS A,KOFOED L B,DU X Y.PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university- and industry-based PhD programmes[J].European journal of engineering education,2008,33(5-6):539-550.
[20] BOLOTNYY V,BASILICO M,BARREIRA P.Graduate student mental health:lessons from American economics departments[J].Journal of economic literature,2022,60(4):1188-1222.
[21] VAN TIENOVEN T P,GLORIEUX A,MINNEN J,et al.Caught between academic calling and academic pressure?working time characteristics,time pressure and time sovereignty predict PhD students’ research engagement[J].Higher education,2024,87:1885-1904.
[22] LEVECQUE K,ANSEEL F,DE BEUCKELAER A,et al.Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students[J].Research policy,2017,46(4):868-879.
[23] 赵世奎,吴彬.破解博士生科研黑箱:博士生科研投入时间的探索性研究[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2022,35(2):151-158.
[24] 林焕翔.博士生学术生活的时间体验与重构:基于一所化学实验室的质性研究[J].中国高教研究,2022(6):77-84.
[25] 郭仕豪.院校发展型支持对博士生心理困难的缓解效应研究:以“因劳致郁”现象为例[J].终身教育研究,2023,34(6):28-35.
[26] 王倩,蒋贵友.博士生学术志趣缘何消退:基于2022年Nature全球博士生调查数据的分析[J].高校教育管理,2023,17(4):102-113.
[27] 邵剑耀.教育环境支持与博士研究生学术化:基于五国调查数据的实证分析[J].高等理科教育,2023(3):106-114.
[28] 沈文钦,王世岳,卞翠.学生还是雇员:博士生身份的跨国比较与启示[J].高等教育研究,2021(12):92-100.
[29] 徐岚,魏庆义.博士生教育质量评价变迁的历程、特征与趋势:基于治理理论分析视角[J].学位与研究生教育,2023(9):85-93.
[30] 蔡三发.优化培养模式构建合理的博士生考评机制[N].光明日报,2024-08-20(14).
基本信息:
DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.01.010
中图分类号:G643
引用信息:
[1]邵剑耀.象牙塔尖的生存困境:博士生工作时间投入与焦虑的全球图景[J].重庆高教研究,2026,14(01):99-111.DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn2097-6763.2026.01.010.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金教育学国家重大项目“中国特色高校评价体系的内涵与建构研究”(VIA230008); 厦门大学研究生田野调查基金项目“地方高校评价价值研究”(2024FG014); 江苏省高等教育学会《江苏高教》专项课题一般课题“就业优先战略视域下大学生就业能力的动态变化、阻滞困境与支持体系构建研究”(2024JSGJ26)
2025-09-18
2025-09-18
2025-09-18