重庆高教研究

针对当前我国教育研究“方法精致、思想贫乏”的实证主义倾向，以1999—2024年全国优秀教育学博士论文的范式演变为线索，发现我国教育研究范式从“基础性选题+人文研究视角”转向“强现实性选题+极致的实证研究方法”,揭示“变量游戏”取代“理论思辨”的深层机制。通过批判性分析诺贝尔经济学奖案例，提出“思想作为研究方法”的三重内涵：价值立场揭示为何研究、问题意识寻找研究什么、理论视角回答如何解释，为构建中国教育学自主知识体系提供可操作路径。

In response to the current positivist tendency of “exquisite methods and poor thinking” in education research in China, taking the paradigm evolution of excellent doctoral dissertations in education from 1999 to 2024 as a clue, the study shows that the paradigm of education research in China has shifted from “basic topic selection+humanistic research perspective” to “strong reality topic selection+ extreme empirical research methods”, revealing the deep mechanism of “variable game” replacing “theoretical speculation”. Through a critical analysis of the Nobel Prize in Economics case, the triple connotation of “thinking as a research method” was proposed: value stance clarifies why to research, problem awareness identifies what to research, and theoretical perspective addresses how to interpret. This framework provides a practical pathway for constructing an autonomous knowledge system for Chinese pedagogy.