600 | 1 | 39 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
围绕高等教育学科建设,通过几个基本关系或范畴的分析,提出如下观点:第一,高等教育学不同于泛化的高等教育研究。高等教育实践活动与实践探究以及其他学科有关的理论研究,是高等教育学的研究素材。中国高等教育学科的建构,带有现实需求驱动的特征,纳入学科的社会建制是促成其生成与快速发展的动因。高等教育学的性质是属于关注生命的应用性软学科,兼具现代科学的三重属性,以部分传统学科如自然科学范式标准和社会科学的纯理论偏好作为高等教育学科合法性依据缺乏理据。第二,高等教育学是具有实践面向的理论研究。高等教育学的理论旨趣在于其立足价值关怀对实践的反思与检视,也在于其以科学态度对实践的理性考察与探究,是为实践提供可参照可选择的装备,而不能混同于实践与实践探究,体现了它具有社会价值的应用性理论旨趣。第三,高等教育学知识体系是理论体系建构的基础。理论体系的建构是高等教育学的理想目标,但它目前尚未超越知识积累与理论沉淀阶段。一个务实的路径是,支持高等教育学人开展围绕特定主题与领域的持续研究,形成丰厚的研究积累,以特定主题的概念清理、知识与理论的梳理以及不同主题之间自然交叉形成的交集,达成基本理论共识。
Abstract:Focusing on the construction of higher education disciplines, through the analysis of several basic relationships or categories, the following views were put forward: Firstly, higher education is different from generalized higher education research. Practical activities and exploration in higher education, the theoretical research related to practical inquiry and other disciplines are the research materials of higher education. The construction of higher education disciplines in China is driven by practical needs, and the social structure of the disciplines is the driving force for their formation and rapid development. The nature of higher education is an applied soft discipline that focuses on life, and has the triple attributes of modern science, and there is no reason to use the paradigm standards of some traditional disciplines such as natural sciences and the pure theoretical preferences of social sciences as the basis for the legitimacy of higher education disciplines. Secondly, higher education is a theoretical study with a practical orientation. The theoretical purpose of higher education lies in its reflection and examination of practice based on value care, and also in its rational investigation and exploration of practice with a scientific attitude, which is to provide reference and optional equipment for practice, rather than to be confused with practice and practical inquiry, which reflects its applied theoretical interest with social value. Thirdly, the knowledge system of higher education is the basis for the construction of the theoretical system. The construction of a theoretical system is the ideal goal of higher education, but it has not yet gone beyond the stage of knowledge accumulation and theoretical precipitation, and a pragmatic path is to support higher education scholars to carry out continuous research around specific themes and fields, achieving a rich research accumulation, and reaching a basic theoretical consensus with the concept of specific topics, the clarification of knowledge and theories, and the intersection of natural cross-formation between different topics.
[1] 邬大光.高等教育学应该研究什么[J].江苏高教,2020(12):10-15.
[2] 邬大光.高等教育学的中国符号[J].高等教育研究,2020,41(7):1-12.
[3] 周川.中国高等教育学四十年:回顾与反思[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023(5):13-21.
[4] 李均.元高等教育学论稿[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2020.
[5] BIGLAN A.The characteristics of subject matters in different academic areas[J].Journal of applied psychology,1973,57(3):195-203.
[6] STOECKER J L.The Biglan classification revisited[J].Research higher education,1993,34:451-464.
[7] 潘懋元.关于高等教育学科建设的若干问题[J].高等教育研究,1993(2):1-6.
[8] 潘懋元.关于高等教育学科建设的反思[J].中国教育科学,2014(4):3-19.
[9] 张应强.超越“学科论”和“研究领域论”之争[J].北京大学教育评论,2011,9(4):49-61.
[10] 潘懋元.知识经济与高等教育的改革和发展[J].高等教育研究,1999(5):6-7.
[11] 胡建华.高等教育学科建设与发展的中国道路[J].山东高等教育,2015,6(19):78-84.
[12] 张应强,唐萌.高等教育学到底有什么用[J].中国高教研究,2016(12):56-62.
[13] 王建华.高等教育学的知识重建[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(5):39-47.
[14] 周川.为高等教育宏大主题的研究辩护[J].高等教育研究,2021,42(5):1-9.
[15] 张德祥.高等教育基本关系与高等教育学体系建设[J].高等教育研究,2020,41(10):46-54.
[16] 陈洪捷.北大高等教育研究:学科发展与范式变迁[J].北京大学教育评论,2010,8(4):2-11.
[17] 李枭鹰,陈武元.高等教育学逻辑起点研究的“四个反思”[J].江苏高教,2021(12):16-23.
[18] 邬大光.论我国高等教育学体系的特殊性[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(5):18-25.
[19] 张应强.高等教育学的学科范式冲突与超越之路[J].教育研究,2014(12):13-23.
基本信息:
DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2025.03.001
中图分类号:G642.3
引用信息:
[1]阎光才.高等教育学科建设的相关议题探讨[J].重庆高教研究,2025,13(03):3-12.DOI:10.15998/j.cnki.issn1673-8012.2025.03.001.
基金信息: